End of ADS-L Digest - 21 Jun 1998 to 22 Jun 1998
************************************************


RFC-822 Header:
----------------------------------------------------
Received: from jerrynet.com ([38.215.115.2])
by uu.psi.com (8.8.8/4.0.940727-PSI/PSINet) with ESMTP
id EAA21726 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 04:02:28 GMT
Received: from listmail.cc.uga.edu (128.192.232.10) by jerrynet.com
with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 1.2); Tue, 23 Jun 1998 00:02:19 -0500
Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by listmail.cc.uga.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT
v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.1D614E50[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]listmail.cc.uga.edu>; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 0:01:47
-0400
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail
V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 9662; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 00:01:13 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 00:01:12 -0400
Reply-To: American Dialect Society
Sender: American Dialect Society
From: Automatic digest processor
Subject: ADS-L Digest - 21 Jun 1998 to 22 Jun 1998
To: Recipients of ADS-L digests
Message-ID: <1313562357-47861625[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]jerrynet.com>


======================================================================

From: Automatic digest processor (6/22/98)
To: Recipients of ADS-L digests

ADS-L Digest - 20 Jun 1998 to 21 Jun 1998 98-06-22 00:00:33
There are 4 messages totalling 186 lines in this issue.

Topics of the day:

1. e-mail/paper mail (2)
2. plural's - a new development?
3. Uncompromise & other compromises

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 13:41:18 -0500
From: "Donald M. Lance"
Subject: Re: e-mail/paper mail

>On Wed, 17 Jun 1998 12:08:30 -0400 Bob Haas
>wrote:
... ...

Later that day, Peter McGraw responded:
>I'd say "e-mail" is either singular or collective, but not plural. It
>seems perfectly natural to say, "He sent me three e-mails yesterday."
>
>BTW, there was a discussion awhile (a couple of years?) ago on this
>list prompted, as I remember, by a New York Times solicitation of
>opinion as to the grammar of the singular of the term. The question,
>as I recall, boiled down to, "Does one say 'AN e-mail'?" I was one who
>piped up and said that seemed unnatural to me and that I would tend
>to say "an e-mail MESSAGE." I'm sure others said the same, though I
>don't remember how many did or how many found "an e-mail" acceptable.

I participated in that discussion, with the same kind of comment as
Peter's. Now I use 'e-mail' as a count noun to refer to e-mail messages or
as a noncount ("mass") noun to refer to the phenomenon.

DMLance