Date: Thu, 6 Apr 1995 22:37:53 EDT
From: Larry Horn LHORN[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU
Subject: Re: "the royal I" ???????????
Bethany writes:
I realize that my J.D. degree disqualifies me for a discussion of
the extent to which lawyers are full of you-know-what; nonetheless, I
want to comment on Bob Wachal's comment on Jack Ford, whose
comment I did NOT hear. I don't know the context in which Fod
apparently included an underling's actions in the word "I," but
the usage seems unexceptionable to me. Lawyers, like some
other people -- i.e., corporate executives -- are responsible often
both for acts they commit and also acts that they have office staff
commit. I can even imagine saying "I did thus-and-so" when I actually
had a research assistant do part of thus-and-so. Or am I missing the
point, Bob?
I'm pretty sure I saw the NBC Nightly News in question, and it wasn't Ford's
own use of "I" that was at issue, but his discussing (in his role of highly-
paid legal Simpsonian poobah) the use of "I" by one of the medical examiners
(Fung?) to describe the collection of material (blood) by an underling who was
evidently a novice. If I'm remembering correctly, it was the novitiate status
of this woman that led to a lively exchange in which Johnnie Cochran dismissed
her as a "rookie", the prosecution objected to that as a slur, and Judge Ito
reminded everyone that some rookies have been MVP's (as opposed to MOP's) in
their rookie year (thinking, perhaps, of Vida Blue or Fred Lynn, although he
wasn't asked for the exact precedents). I better stop before someone asks me
to move it all to the forensic.lx list. --Larry
P.S. Oh, I forgot. The point. This would not constitute a royal "I" so much
as an "I" of concealment, hoping to get away with a possible misjudgment of
allowing a rookie, or novice, underling to (mis?)handle evidence in the trial
of the century. The royal "I" per se is more like a scientist using a first
person singular in appropriating the work of junior colleagues and graduate
students, I'd think. (Apocryphal as such tales always are.)