Date:  Thu, 6 Apr 1995 06:19:25 -0500

From:  Natalie Maynor <maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]RA.MSSTATE.EDU>

Subject: Bounced Mail



****************************************************************

 REMINDER: WHEN INCLUDING A PREVIOUS LIST POSTING IN SOMETHING

 YOU'RE SENDING TO THE LIST, BE SURE TO EDIT OUT ALL REFERENCES

 ADS-L IN THE HEADERS.

****************************************************************

> Date:     Wed, 5 Apr 1995 21:09:23 -0400

> Subject:   ADS-L: error report from S1.CSUHAYWARD.EDU

>

> The enclosed mail file, found in the ADS-L reader and shown under the spoolid

> 0266 in the console log, has been identified as a possible delivery error

> notice for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field

> pointing to the list has been found in mail body.

>

> ------------------ Message in error (57 lines) -------------------------

> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 16:00:20 -0700

> From: dalford[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]s1.csuhayward.edu (Dan Alford)

> Subject: Subject: Subject: With a name like _________ ...

>

>    Date:     Wed, 5 Apr 1995 11:42:23 EDT

>    Comments:   Resent-From: Larry Horn <LHORN[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]YaleVM.CIS.Yale.edu>

>    Comments:   Originally-From: "Jerry (NMN) Miller"

>           <miller[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]NEWTON.FRANKLINCOLL.EDU>

>    From: Larry Horn <LHORN[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU>

>    Subject:   Re: Cigarette brands. Help, please!

>

>    Jerry NMN Miller writes (inter alia):

>

>       I would definitely stay away from any brand called "Death" (on your list)

>    just on general principle, just as I would not fly on Just Short of the Runway

>    Airlines!

>    __________________              jmiller

>

>    I was wondering about Death brand cigs too; perhaps the tobacco companies are

>    taking a new tack on pre-empting false advertising lawsuits. But I like that

>    airlines company as well. It reminds me of the routine Monty Python used to

>    have (or some other group--does anyone recall it?) that played off the old

>    "With a name like Smuckers it HAS to be good", creating e.g. Vomit brand

>    canned ham or Dead Cat brand aerosol (those weren't the original examples, but

>    should give you the idea): "With a name like ____, it has to be absolutely

>    fanTAStic!"

>

>    Larry

>

> If I remember correctly, it was SNL, Saturday Night Live, that begain in their

> faux-commercials the takeoffs: "With a name like 'Mangled Baby Ducklings', it

> has to be good."

>

> Vis-a-vis the original thread, shall we for the sake of commercial propriety

> ignore the various "comic" brand of cigarettes such as "Camel Shit" and

> "Bull Shit" that can be found in Montana and novelty stores (sic)?

>

>                            -- Moonhawk (%->)

>   <"The fool on the hill sees the sun going down and>

>   <the eyes in his head see the world spinning round">

>                <-- McCartney/Lennon>