Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 07:58:28 -0600

From: Natalie Maynor maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]RA.MSSTATE.EDU

Subject: Words of the Year



I think we need to keep emphasizing that the Words of the Year are not

usually new words and possibly remove the word "newly" from "newly

prominent." I remember last year having to respond to lots of ridicule

of ADS as being "way behind the times." It's starting again this year.

Somebody forwarded Allan's press-release posting to Words-L this morning,

where it has already gotten one response:



Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 07:03:45 CST

Sender: English Language Discussion Group WORDS-L[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uga.cc.uga.edu

From: Tushar Samant samant[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]CS.UCHICAGO.EDU

Subject: Re: Let the word go out

To: Multiple recipients of list WORDS-L WORDS-L[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]UGA.CC.UGA.EDU



All those words are for *94*?



Where the hell have they been?