Date:  Tue, 27 Jan 1998 19:38:56 -0500
From:  Beverly Flanigan <FLANIGAN[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]OUVAXA.CATS.OHIOU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Sexgate explained; ADS-L again

  Correction, Mr. Popik: Your etymological research is perfectly
  legitimate; some items interest me, and some don't, but they are not
  outside the domain of the ADS, and you do not NOT belong on the list.
  Read again what Tim and I commented on: The little made-up dialogues
  add gratuitous (and, to some of us, tasteless) humor to an otherwise
  quite acceptable report on -gate words and other etymologies.