Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 08:16:47 -0400
From: Wayne Glowka wglowka[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]MAIL.GAC.PEACHNET.EDU
Subject: A Dumb Question about the NEH
I lean so far to the left that I have trouble negotiating narrow doorways,
but I don't fully see the disadvantages of transferring 80% of NEH funds to
the state humanities agencies.
At my institution, we have received money both from the Georgia Endowment
for the Humanities (which is funded by the NEH) and from the NEH itself for
various projects, and I thus have no prejudice against either agency in
regard to funding possibilities. However, after a year of working with
grants on a small scale, I have developed prejudices about working with
state and federal agencies. The people from the GEH travel around the
state and give little workshops on how to apply for funds. An interested
party can call them and actually talk to someone who administers the
program. My other limited experience with state agencies has also
impressed me: they know who we are; if we have some trouble with the
application process, the state senator across the street can call for us;
we can check out the possibilities for funding before we go through the
trouble of filling out mounds of paper.
The NEH Fellowship application is a minimal affair, but the other federal
applications I have seen are nightmares. Just the mailing directions take
up a two-column page or more! Calling for information is also difficult
and expensive if you don't already know the right person to call on the
right day.
I can see that a major project like DARE would be a horrible drain on a
specific state allocation (and therefore might not get funded), but from
where I sit (in a small college in the middle of nowhere), I can see many
perhaps selfish advantages in having money available at the state level.
Wayne Glowka
Professor of English
Director of Research and Graduate Student Services
Georgia College
Milledgeville, GA 31061
912-453-4222
wglowka[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]mail.gac.peachnet.edu