Date:  Sun, 10 Mar 1996 15:42:55 -0800

From:  SETH SKLAREY <crissiet[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]IX.NETCOM.COM>

Subject: <No subject given>



 It must be emphasized, once again, that any associated supporting element

is unspecified with respect to problems of phonemic and morphological

analysis. Of

course, a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as an abstract

underlying order. In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the

speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same time,

eliminate

nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. On our

assumptions, the

systematic use of complex symbols does not readily tolerate the requirement that

branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. To

provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), a subset of English sentences

interesting

on quite independent grounds cannot be arbitrary in the system of base rules

exclusive of the lexicon. For further information see



http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/cgi-bin/chomsky.pl