End of ADS-L Digest - 9 Mar 1996 to 10 Mar 1996

***********************************************





There are 6 messages totalling 136 lines in this issue.



Topics of the day:



 1. <No subject given>

 2. drouth etc. (4)

 3. ADS session at M/MLA, 2nd call for abstract



----------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  Mon, 11 Mar 1996 03:48:59 -0800

From:  SETH SKLAREY <crissiet[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]IX.NETCOM.COM>

Subject: <No subject given>



> It must be emphasized, once again, that any associated supporting element

>is unspecified with respect to problems of phonemic and morphological

>analysis. Of

>course, a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as an abstract

>underlying order. In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the

>speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same time,

>eliminate

>nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. On our

>assumptions, the

>systematic use of complex symbols does not readily tolerate the requirement

that

>branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. To

>provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), a subset of English sentences

>interesting

>on quite independent grounds cannot be arbitrary in the system of base rules

>exclusive of the lexicon. For further information see

>

>http://www.ling.lsa.umich.edu/cgi-bin/chomsky.pl

>

>