Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 21:36:20 -0600 From: Natalie Maynor Subject: Bounced Mail > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 21:25:50 -0500 > From: "L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8b)" > Subject: ADS-L: error report from ACPUB.DUKE.EDU > >The enclosed message, found in the ADS-L mailbox and shown under the spool ID >1538 in the system log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice >for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field pointing to >the list has been found in mail body. > > ------------- Message in error (46 lines) -------------------------- > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 21:26:46 -0500 (EST) > From: Ronald Butters > Subject: Re: Asian and "PC" > > "Asian" seems to me to be broader in scope than "Oriental" had become > before "Oriental" fell from grace. > > I still refuse to use the term "PC" > until it is applied to euphemisms across the board and not > just used for > euphemisms that Pat Buchanan would sneer at. For example, why doesn't > anyone call "prolife" a "PC" term that replaced the much more accurate > "anti-abortion"? Euphemistic language games are at least as much a part > of right-wing political endeavor as of the left, but only the left takes > the hit when the term "PC" is employed. "PC" is in this sense in itself a > right-wing "PC" term. > > On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, Ron Rabin wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 17:41:12 -0500 > > From: Ron Rabin > > Subject: Asian > > > > Has the meaning of Asian changed recently in American English? > > When Oriental became no longer PC, Asian was substituted. Does Asian > > now mean what Oriental used to mean whatever Asian used to mean before > > this substitution? > > Ideas? > > Ron Rabin > > Buffalo State College