Date:  Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:18:04 -0500

From:  "Salikoko S. Mufwene" <s-mufwene[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]UCHICAGO.EDU>

Subject: Re: discussant



At 9:19 AM 3/29/96, M. Lynne Murphy wrote:



>i think "discussant" is pretty standard in conferences where there

>are papers and reaction papers. so, there are presenters and

>discussants. perhaps it's also used in cases like _current

>anthropology_ and _brain and behavioral sciences_ where the same

>format is put to print, but i'm not sure. (where there would be

>authors and discussants, i guess.) it's certainly the noun i'd use to

>refer to such people.



  In the BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES the discussions are identified as

"commentaries", I think. So I would expect the authors of such discussion

essays to be "commentators", although this term seems to have been used

only for audio and visual modes of communication.



Sali.





*******************************************************************

Salikoko S. Mufwene            s-mufwene[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uchicago.edu

University of Chicago           312-702-8531; FAX 312-702-9861

Department of Linguistics

1010 East 59th Street

Chicago, IL 60637

*******************************************************************