Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 15:28:30 -0600

From: Natalie Maynor maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]RA.MSSTATE.EDU

Subject: Bounced Mail



****************************************************************

REMINDER: WHEN INCLUDING A PREVIOUS LIST POSTING IN SOMETHING

YOU'RE SENDING TO THE LIST, BE SURE TO EDIT OUT ALL REFERENCES

TO ADS-L IN THE HEADERS.

****************************************************************

Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:47:47 -0500

From: "L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8b)" LISTSERV[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uga.cc.uga.edu

Subject: ADS-L: error report from ACPUB.DUKE.EDU



The enclosed message, found in the ADS-L mailbox and shown under the spool ID

0561 in the system log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice

for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field pointing to

the list has been found in mail body.



----------------- Message in error (36 lines) --------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:48:12 -0500 (EST)

From: Ronald Butters amspeech[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]acpub.duke.edu

Subject: Re: sneakers



It is (or used to be) regional. There was an article about thils in

AMERICAN SPEECH several years ago.



On Wed, 29 Nov 1995, POLSKY ELLEN S wrote:



Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 17:10:22 -0700

From: POLSKY ELLEN S Ellen.Polsky[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]COLORADO.EDU

Subject: sneakers



Is the "sneaker"-"tennis shoe" distinction purely regional? Do some

people use both with a different meaning attached to each? I come from

Phila., and I used to use only the term "sneaker", but out here in

Boulder, Colorado, it seems that "tennis shoe" is used exclusively. Any

insight?



Ellen S. Polsky (Ellen.Polsky[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]Colorado.EDU)