Date:  Thu, 30 Nov 1995 15:28:30 -0600

From:  Natalie Maynor <maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]RA.MSSTATE.EDU>

Subject: Bounced Mail



****************************************************************

 REMINDER: WHEN INCLUDING A PREVIOUS LIST POSTING IN SOMETHING

 YOU'RE SENDING TO THE LIST, BE SURE TO EDIT OUT ALL REFERENCES

 TO ADS-L IN THE HEADERS.

****************************************************************

> Date:     Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:47:47 -0500

> From: "L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8b)" <LISTSERV[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uga.cc.uga.edu>

> Subject:   ADS-L: error report from ACPUB.DUKE.EDU

>

>The enclosed message, found in the ADS-L mailbox and shown under the spool ID

>0561 in the system log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice

>for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field pointing to

>the list has been found in mail body.

>

>----------------- Message in error (36 lines) --------------------------

> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:48:12 -0500 (EST)

> From: Ronald Butters <amspeech[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]acpub.duke.edu>

> Subject: Re: sneakers

>

> It is (or used to be) regional. There was an article about thils in

> AMERICAN SPEECH several years ago.

>

> On Wed, 29 Nov 1995, POLSKY ELLEN S wrote:

>

> > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 17:10:22 -0700

> > From: POLSKY ELLEN S <Ellen.Polsky[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]COLORADO.EDU>

> > Subject: sneakers

> >

> > Is the "sneaker"-"tennis shoe" distinction purely regional? Do some

> > people use both with a different meaning attached to each? I come from

> > Phila., and I used to use only the term "sneaker", but out here in

> > Boulder, Colorado, it seems that "tennis shoe" is used exclusively. Any

> > insight?

> >

> > Ellen S. Polsky (Ellen.Polsky[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]Colorado.EDU)

> >