Date:  Sun, 30 Oct 1994 19:01:47 EST

From:  Shani Walker <s.walker[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]MSUACAD.MOREHEAD-ST.EDU>

Subject: Re: offending idiot



First I would like to say that all this talk about offending terms is getting

on my last and final nerve...what is the big deal?  The term "nigger" simply

means ignorance, and those who specialize in using this nerve are seldom seen

useful for anything else. Being an African-American female in this society has

made me come to realize and accept that you can not please everybody. We are

all adults here, so let's act like it. On to another subject...have you ever

heard of the term "twader"? My friends and I use this term in reference to

someone who babbles on and on about irrelevant facts. Have you heard this term

use before? If so, in this same reference?



Shani Walker

Morehead State University

Morehead, KY



>  Date:     Sat, 22 Oct 1994 10:34:50 CST

>  From: salikoko mufwene <mufw[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]MIDWAY.UCHICAGO.EDU>

>

>  In Message Thu, 20 Oct 1994 08:56:23 -0700, Roger Vanderveen

>     <rvander[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]ichips.intel.com> writes about frivolous changing of

>     "acceptable" names for non-whites.

>

>

>   I am afraid you have trivialized the offense in Chuck's note. As well

>  stated in David Muschell's reply, the offense derives in part from Chuck's

>  grandparents naming their dog a racial/racist epithet. Once posted on the

>  dam, not everybody new "Nigger" was used for a dog.

>

> Granted.

>

>                           Besides at the time the

>  dog was named "Nigger," this term was not an accepted designation for Blacks

>  or African Americans. Do you recall any time in the history of the USA when

>  "Nigger" was an acceptable term for African Americans?

>

> Sure. It's an acceptable term now, in many quarters. For myself, I do not and

> would never use it, and cringe when I do hear it used. I will admit that it's

> not acceptable now among the media and universities, but I know that if many

> of the readers of this list went off-campus, they would find lots of people

> using it, especially in the South. For some, there is a negative element, and

> for others, it's simply the term they've used all they're lives. Who has the

> right to sit in judgment?

>

>                             I do not know that

>  African Americans would be offended today if you described them as "black"

>  (with or without a cap).

>

> I don't get the "cap" reference. And how about negro?

>

>                 While we might find it amusing that names for a

>  particular ethnic group keep changing (and I take no offense at this), the

>  particular incident at issue here is not so amusing (except perhaps in the

>  privacy of our homes).

>

> So I can laugh at home, but not in public? Don't ask, don't tell?

>

>             I doubt that the reason the sign was removed had to

>  do with being politically correct. There is more to the act than some may

>  want to recognize.

>

>  Chuck has been wise enough to apologize. I, among the people who were

>  offended, accept the apology. But I find your trivialization of the issue

>  ridiculous.

>

> All right, then let me use another example having nothing to do with race:

> idiot, moron, half-wit, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled, special,

> mentally challenged. Nothing trivial, only individual words. See the

> connection?

>

> ===============================================================================

> Roger Vanderveen                       Intel Corporation

> (503) 696-4331                          Hillsboro, OR

> ===============================================================================

>