Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 12:17:12 -0500 From: Natalie Maynor Subject: Bounced Mail **************************************************************** REMINDER: WHEN INCLUDING A PREVIOUS LIST POSTING IN SOMETHING YOU'RE SENDING TO THE LIST, BE SURE TO EDIT OUT ALL REFERENCES TO ADS-L IN THE HEADERS. **************************************************************** > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 12:46:31 -0400 > From: "L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8b)" > Subject: ADS-L: error report from ACPUB.DUKE.EDU > >The enclosed message, found in the ADS-L mailbox and shown under the spool ID >9340 in the system log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice >for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field pointing to >the list has been found in mail body. > > ----------- Message in error (43 lines) -------------------------- > Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 12:46:44 -0400 (EDT) > From: Ronald Butters > Subject: Re: folk/folklore > > I never noticed this in my ownspeech--when I try; to do it ilt seems like > akind of anticipatory assimilation tothe /l/ of -LORE. > > On Fri, 27 Oct 1995, > Wayne Glowka wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 08:21:07 -0400 > > From: Wayne Glowka > > Subject: folk/folklore > > > > An astute sophomore in my linguistics class yesterday asked why "folk" has > > no /l/ but why the same element in "folklore" does. I had never noticed > > this difference in my own pronunciation before, but I maintain it. Anybody > > got a good explanation? My only guess is that "folklore" with an /l/ in > > "folk" is a reading-influenced pronunciation. > > > > > > Wayne Glowka > > Professor of English > > Director of Research and Graduate Student Services > > Georgia College > > Milledgeville, GA 31061 > > 912-453-4222 > > wglowka[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]mail.gac.peachnet.edu > >