Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 06:03:04 -0500
From: Natalie Maynor maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]RA.MSSTATE.EDU
Subject: Bounced Mail
****************************************************************
REMINDER: WHEN INCLUDING A PREVIOUS LIST POSTING IN SOMETHING
YOU'RE SENDING TO THE LIST, BE SURE TO EDIT OUT ALL REFERENCES
TO ADS-L IN THE HEADERS.
****************************************************************
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 02:15:53 -0400
From: "L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8b)" LISTSERV[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uga.cc.uga.edu
Subject: ADS-L: error report from MAROON.TC.UMN.EDU
The enclosed message, found in the ADS-L mailbox and shown under the spool ID
3575 in the system log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice
for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field pointing to
the list has been found in mail body.
----------------- Message in error (64 lines) --------------------------
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 20:20:51 -0500 (CDT)
From: Daniel S Goodman dsg[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]maroon.tc.umn.edu
Subject: Re: Usage: "any more" (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 22:40:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Fred Shapiro fred.shapiro[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]yale.edu
To: Daniel S Goodman dsg[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]maroon.tc.umn.edu
Cc: stumpers stumpers-List[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]CRF.CUIS.EDU
Subject: Re: Usage: "any more" (fwd)
On Sun, 17 Sep 1995, Daniel S Goodman wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 16:32:07 EDT
From: Larry Horn LHORN%YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]vm1.spcs.umn.edu
Subject: Re: Usage: "any more" (fwd)
I don't know if I can track down the last two or three flurries of postings
about positive (non-polarity) 'anymore' from my old ADS and Linguist List
files, but the earliest citation I've personally attested is from Lawrence,
_Women in Love_, when Birkin announces "Suffering bores me any more". This
also demonstrates pretty clearly that it's not (just) an Americanism. I seem
to recall other citations from the British Isles, but (as you may have
discovered) research along the usual lines is a bit hampered by the fact that
the OED doesn't consider 'anymore' a word, so there's no way to check for
first citings/sightings. --Larry Horn
Yes, _any more_ is in the OED, s.v. _more_ 4.a. The OED notes that "The
phrase _any more_ (freq. written as _anymore_) is also used in
affirmative as well as negative contexts in the sense `now, now-a-days,
at the present time; from now on'. _dial._ (chiefly U.S.)." The
earliest citations given are:
1898 _Eng. Dial. Dict._ I. 63/1 A servant being instructed how to act,
will answer `I will do it any more.'
1903 _McClure's Mag._ Dec. 215/1 There's just only this one any more.
I have not checked other sources, such as DARE; there may be earlier evidence
there.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Fred R. Shapiro Editor +
+ Associate Librarian for Public Services OXFORD DICTIONARY OF AMERICAN +
+ Yale Law School LEGAL QUOTATIONS +
+ e-mail: shapiro[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]minerva.cis.yale.edu (Oxford University Press) +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++