Date:  Thu, 7 Sep 1995 08:29:43 -0500

From:  Natalie Maynor <maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]RA.MSSTATE.EDU>

Subject: Bounced Mail



****************************************************************

 REMINDER: WHEN INCLUDING A PREVIOUS LIST POSTING IN SOMETHING

 YOU'RE SENDING TO THE LIST, BE SURE TO EDIT OUT ALL REFERENCES

 TO ADS-L IN THE HEADERS.

****************************************************************

> Date:     Thu, 7 Sep 1995 09:11:31 -0400

> From: "L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8b)" <LISTSERV[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uga.cc.uga.edu>

> Subject:   ADS-L: error report from VIOLET.BERKELEY.EDU

>

>The enclosed message, found in the ADS-L mailbox and shown under the spool ID

>7952 in the system log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice

>for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field pointing to

>the list has been found in mail body.

>

>------------------ Message in error (51 lines) --------------------------

> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 06:11:31 -0700

> From: ctlntt[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]violet.berkeley.edu

> Subject: Re: English-only

>

>    Date:     Thu, 7 Sep 1995 08:06:58 -0400

>    From: Heilan Yvette Grimes <HEP2[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]AOL.COM>

>    Subject:   Re: English-only

>

>>Mikey wrote a message which not everyone on this list

>>agrees with, and it is perfectly appropriate to take

>>exception with his ideas. Criticism, however, seems

>>to degenerate into a kind of commentary (such as

>>"just which language were you writing in? I couldn't tell")

>>that is not only inappropriate, but also entirely out of

>>keeping with what should be the professional tenor of

>>a list like this one. If we are here to discuss ideas,

>>decorum is essential --and not just a minimum of it. If

>>some participants choose to ignore this norm, the best

>>thing others can do is to ignore them altogether

>>instead of taking pot-shot at them in a manner that

>>does not contribute to clarify the issues at hand.

>>

>>Milton Azevedo

>

>I believe the person commenting on Mikey's English usage was pointing out the

>ridiculousness of someone being so adamantly opposed to second languages

>while being so grammatically incorrect in his own language. It is obvious

>Mikey doesn't speak a second language, and obvious he barely speaks a first.

>

>

> Yes siree, maybe "obvious he barely speaks a first" but he shore ain't alone.