Date:  Wed, 27 Sep 1995 17:02:39 -0500

From:  "Dennis R. Preston" <preston[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]PILOT.MSU.EDU>

Subject: Re: candy bars and measurements



Thanks Kate. PayDay is the abomination I remember, but, as you note, we

called it a candy bar (in spite of its lack of chocolate), and that was my

point.

I continue (obviously) to have my own opinion about whether any of them

were 'fabulously delicious.

Dennis Preston

<preston[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]pilot.msu.edu>



>At 8:10 AM 9/27/95 -0500, Dennis R. Preston wrote:

>

>>In the dim past, before I discovered Cabernet Savignon, I ate candy bars. I

>>remember eating one horror called a 'Baby Ruth.' It had an (UGH!) peanut

>>covering and, as I recall, no chocolate at all.

>

>I beg to differ. Baby Ruths are covered in chocolate, and, as I recall, are

>fabulously delicious. The one covered in peanuts is a Pay Day, and when you

>have it for breakfast along with a Diet Dr. Depper in graduate school it

>allows you the illusion that you're getting a little protein.

>

>I would describe a Pay Day as a candy bar, despite its chococatelessness.

>

>Kate Catmull  kate[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]bga.com